REJECTEDWALL #179

Sam Ikkurty

Posted April 14, 2026
PERMANENT LINKcftcsucks.com/179
PDF Document — 3 pages↓ Download PDF
SAM IKKURTY — CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS ADVOCATE samikkurty.com
C A S E A N A L Y S I S
Why the CFTC's 'Ponzi Scheme'
Allegation Is Mathematically
Impossible
Published at samikkurty.com/blog/ponzi-scheme-allegation-mathematically-impossible |
Case No. 1:22-cv-02465 (N.D. Ill.) | 7th Cir. No. 24-2684
The CFTC's central allegation — that Rose City Fund operated as a Ponzi
scheme — is not just factually wrong. It is mathematically impossible, as
demonstrated by the independent StoneTurn analysis and the fund's own
blockchain records.
## What Is a Ponzi Scheme?
A Ponzi scheme has one defining mathematical characteristic:
withdrawals must be funded by new investor capital, not by real
investment returns. This means:
1. The scheme must continuously attract new investors to pay existing
ones
2. The scheme must collapse when new investment cannot cover
withdrawals
3. There can be no legitimate returns all "profits" are simply
redistributed capital
## Why Our Returns Disprove the Ponzi Theory
Charles R. Soha, CFE, Managing Director at StoneTurn Group, conducted
an independent analysis of Rose City Fund's financial records. His
findings:
- Fund II investors received returns as high as 339.55% in one year
- Fund I achieved a mean CAGR of 303% for exiting partners
These returns are mathematically impossible in a Ponzi scheme. Here is
why:
In a Ponzi scheme, if investors are receiving 303% annual returns, the
scheme would need to attract 3x its existing capital base every year just to
break even. No Ponzi scheme in history has sustained this — they all
collapse within months.
The only explanation for these returns is legitimate investment gains — in
this case, from DeFi protocols on the Ethereum blockchain.
## The Blockchain Evidence
Every single transaction in Rose City Fund is recorded immutably on the
Ethereum blockchain at wallet address
0x168fa4917e7cd18f4ed3dc313c4975851ca9e5e7. This is a public record
that anyone can verify.
The blockchain shows:
- $19 million in verifiable DeFi transactions
- Legitimate interactions with DeFi protocols (OHM, KLIMA, and others)
- No evidence of fund commingling or misappropriation
Investigator Dasso admitted under oath: "As far as this case, I did not
look at the blockchain, correct." Her answer: "Correct."
The lead investigator in a case involving a DeFi fund never reviewed the
blockchain. This is not incompetence — it is willful blindness.
## Conclusion
The CFTC's Ponzi scheme allegation fails on every level:
- Mathematically impossible given the verified returns
- Factually disproven by the blockchain records
- Contradicted by the investigators' own sworn testimony
The prosecution of Rose City Fund is not about protecting investors. It is
about regulatory overreach — and the evidence proves it.
Sam Ikkurty · samikkurty.com · All documents and evidence available at samikkurty.com/
legal-documents

Share this record

VERIFICATION RECORD

Submission trackF
StatusREJECTED
Posted2026-04-14T08:14:06.000Z
SHA-256 hashba8ec41a7bb8e9ae8040df9f9bc8ac55b0182e978859b67eb5c6ce6b50e3f5d3
Permanent record. This document is permanently archived on Arweave — a decentralised storage network — where it will persist independently of this website, any server, or any court order. The SHA-256 hash above cryptographically proves the document has not been altered since archiving.